Ujjal Dosanjh

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Archives
    Archives Contains a list of blog posts that were created previously.
  • Login

Elitism such as Chaggar's, intended or not, would be deadly for Trudeau Liberals!

Posted by on
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1187
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Team Trudeau's "sunny ways" are constantly being clouded over by the drip-drip of the fallout from the political fundraisers that the Prime Minister and his ministers continue to hold and attend despite mounting opposition, media and public concerns. The Prime Minister and his ministers have continued to defend what now seems indefensible. The whole practice seems even more questionable in view of the latest revelations in the Globe &Mail about how some organisers of the Trudeau fundraisers have been asking the invitees to pay $4500 and in some cases $5000--well above the $1525 allowed per person annually.

It all started in April of this year with our good Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould insisting on proceeding with her $500 per head private fundraiser at a Toronto law firm --which I had publicly urged her to cancel as had many others. It didn't jibe with the new Trudeau guidelines to his ministers, presumably to himself as well, against preferential access or the appearance of preferential access to government for individuals or organisations that may have made financial contributions to the party; and the guidelines had gone on to state that this obligation to deny preferential access wasn't satisfied by simply living within the current laws.

Ironically the whole Liberal defence of the "cash for access" now rests solely as the practice being within the existing law; damn the Trudeau guidelines. And to make matters worse Trudeau's otherwise smart Liberal House leader in the House of Commons,Bardish Chaggar, in an interview with the Huffington Post, shockingly opined that the "House of Commons is not where [the politicians] talk about political fundraising"..

No matter how one viewed the political fundraising that is fast becoming an albatross around my political party's neck, one would have thought that House of Commons is definitely the place to talk about it. It is the People's House. Political fundraising--good, bad or ugly--is people's business; and the people's business belongs and can be discussed--must be discussed--in the People's House.

Ms. Chaggar, welcome to government; since the Liberals are in power it is their conduct and standards that are at the forefront in public discussions. Over 60 percent Canadians are concerned about the perception that is created by the current Liberal practice of fundraising--followed until recently by all political parties--that the media have dubbed "cash for access. Before the X-MAS break the government had been on the ropes in the House of Commons for not living up to PM Trudeau's own guidelines for government ministers. The House is a place for the government and the opposition to discuss anything they deem relevant; and in the question period the speaker prohibits questions that may appear out of order. Insofar as the Commons Speaker didn't stop the opposition from asking questions about "cash for access", he must have deemed them appropriate and permissible. Quite appropriately Chaggar later told the Huffington Post that she misspoke about the House not being a place for the fundraising discussion.

Chaggar's words were reminiscent of Prime Minister Kim Campbell's elitist dictum of an election being no time to discuss serious issues. Chaggar had gone on to say "political parties can talk about that [political fundraising]" among themselves, away from the House, since the People's House was not the place for it. Chaggar's remarks may not have been intended to convey elitism. But they reeked of it. Trudeau would do well to remember himself and remind Chaggar that after what appeared to her elitist remarks, Campbell's Tories had suffered their worst electoral loss.

@ujjaldosanjh

 

 

 

 

 

Last modified on